THE SUSPECTS MUST CONTACT THE FBI OR SIT DOWN AND ANSWER A QUESTIONAIRE: IT IS TIME TO INTERVIEW EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM

1/11/2009 3:35:57 PM I have ordered all of the suspects and judges to make formal and official interviews with the FBI who are either entangled or involved in this matter. If they are not acting on the behalf of someone; then they can answer a few questions which I have asked the FBI to follow up on. In other words, this pressure and false arrests; efforts to extort money or terrorize; have specific individuals who are currently still trying to engage in this behavior; we have ordered them to a specific FBI office for an interview with a larger terror plot and acting on behalf of some political entity who is also under investigation at this time. If there is a complaint or case against them; they must make the effort to this interview so they understand the nature of the case and how they can separate or become more involved in it; such as the criminal element of it. We need to know if they are willing to profit off this terror plot if we complete it and determine they did. We need to know if these politicians were and are willing to halt all matters to make sure nobody profited or profiteered off this or other terror plots. This is the whole point, when and if they knew; how did they for forward; and how did they react when alerted of this? Was there a negative or positive attitude or was some clever deception used to frustrate the case more; perhaps to obstruct justice and a formal act of warfare on the country? The charges involve the death penalty and a military tribunal. This terror plot involves financial and economic matters so we must take measures to preserve the investigation and the natural aspect of it.

1/11/2009 3:43:39 PM You are asked to voluntarily sit down and speak to the FBI or other interviewers who are expecting you to make specific comments or official, for the record, answers to certain questions regarding this case. If you fail to reference this communication and “just in case” there is any doubt or some bad mouthing effort; then it is never dangerous or illogical to take that extra step to cover your back or to just sit down and make official statements. All suspects asked to appear will be asked a set of brief questions catered to each person and their case file. Because there are both eye witnesses and statements or comments made; failure to take this additional step will imply or suggest a desire not to clear the record or voluntarily cooperate and assist in rooting out the “miscommunications.” We are not going to round up random people or create a series of discontent in the apprehending process; we merely sent out a few notices and ask voluntarily if they wish to show an attitude of being honest and forthright about a terror and extortion plot which involves trillions in federal deficit spending funds.

Those who were involved in the home invasion, extortion of money, or legal pressures have been issued a written document to alert them of a current federal case and investigation and how they are a suspect asked to answer a few questions about what they know and did not know before they became suspects. If they fail to take those steps, then we can reasonably assume the charges against them is not worth their effort to clear up or needed to educate them in what they are doing or attempting. In other words, they are acting on the cognition and knowledge of malice and suspicion in a terror plot and they refuse to stop or assist in the capture, arrest, or the military annihilation of it. There are a series of questions prepared for them specifically to determine what they knew and how they acted upon what they had known. Two letters were sent out to the primary local actors and notices were posted to those being questioned and interviewed by the investigators. If they wish to clear up what was said or what was recorded, they may sit down with formal legal federal prosecutors to remove the cloud of suspicion and what was said or recorded. They are not forced to acknowledge their involvement but asked to voluntarily help to clear up some issues; it is merely an invitation to discovery and innocence to determine how cooperative or negative attitude the case involves, terror and espionage. They could be a prisoner, being used or exploited, or confused by miscommunications; is there some force acting on them or compelling them to become suspects?